|
Post by tangent on Feb 15, 2010 21:07:24 GMT
We need to rectify that. Though actually, shouldn't it be the fifth wall? We have left, right, top, and bottom. So the wall that gets broken is the audience wall.
|
|
|
Post by stokerino on Feb 15, 2010 21:13:49 GMT
Floors and ceilings aren't walls...
|
|
|
Post by Emily on Feb 15, 2010 21:51:06 GMT
says you. What if the room got turned 90 dgreesm from top to bottom.
|
|
|
Post by stokerino on Feb 15, 2010 22:38:07 GMT
Then one wall has reneged on its prior classification to be replaced by another.
|
|
|
Post by stuart alman on Feb 15, 2010 22:39:07 GMT
i think the logic is u have left, right, backdrop and then front which is the viewers screen hence fourth. As tim says floors and ceilings don't count cos even if you rotate 90 degrees u still have a floor and a ceiling and four walls.
|
|
|
Post by stokerino on Feb 15, 2010 22:40:07 GMT
...Well, at least I kept my tongue in my cheek when I said it. >_>
|
|
|
Post by stuart alman on Feb 15, 2010 22:41:12 GMT
damn u tim posting at same time as me lol
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Feb 15, 2010 23:33:19 GMT
What if you have a comic set in outer space without artificial gravity? =^-^=
|
|
|
Post by wanderer on Feb 15, 2010 23:59:58 GMT
Fae REALLY need some new riddles. Yay for genre-savvy Jin and Steve. Somehow it doesn't surprise me that they were the ones to get it, although I also like Claudia's intelligence in setting restrictions on the consequences of losing. Is it just me, or did little Fae's wings vanish in the last panel? And, oh, hey, it's... whatshisname. The ineffective redshirt crush-on-Jin guy. He hasn't been killed yet?
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Feb 16, 2010 0:17:33 GMT
Yet. *sights his scope*
|
|
|
Post by stuart alman on Feb 16, 2010 9:42:15 GMT
why is everyone trying to kill the poor techno nerd lol
|
|
|
Post by stuart alman on Feb 16, 2010 9:48:39 GMT
What if you have a comic set in outer space without artificial gravity? =^-^= Oh and tangent i would have to double check with the people on the international space station but im fairly sure you still designate one direction as up (thus ceiling) and one direction as down (thus floor). This would also explain why all ships always meet on the same trajectory in star trek .
|
|
|
Post by stokerino on Feb 16, 2010 10:13:59 GMT
That doesn't explain why all ships meet on the same trajectory in Star Trek. Not in the slightest. >_>
The one semi-rational excuse might be that they keep their ships level with the galactic plane (since the galaxy is roughly disc-shaped), but even that is rather farcical logic given how it averages at about 1000 light years thick.
Star Trek ships meet on the same trajectory because the pictures look better that way. Deal with it.
As for the International Space Station, the only sense in which they might have a designated floor/etc. in each room (or module) is because they have to have appliances/furniture/etc. in them and it just makes everything easier if you can simply "float over" to the next one as you move between them, rather than having to do an 180 degree turn at the same time.
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Feb 16, 2010 11:19:37 GMT
why is everyone trying to kill the poor techno nerd lol Because the Nerdboy has to die! =^-^=
|
|
|
Post by stuart alman on Feb 16, 2010 12:31:42 GMT
There have been rare occasions in star trek where ships met at slightly different angles
|
|
|
Post by stuart alman on Feb 16, 2010 12:33:06 GMT
oh and consider this how do we know that a romulan warbird is "the right way up" maybe they are constantly upside down
|
|
|
Post by stokerino on Feb 16, 2010 12:41:42 GMT
I was going to dignify that with a response, but then thought better of it. ¬_¬
|
|
|
Post by Emily on Feb 16, 2010 16:13:38 GMT
I would love it if ships met each other on funny angles or upside down... wanderer... oh pants, yes you're right her wings are gone in the last panel. ....there's another thing to add to the list of things I get wrong on a week by week basis. Wings are the hardest bit to remember to draw...
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Feb 16, 2010 16:25:58 GMT
Pants? oO
|
|
|
Post by Emily on Feb 16, 2010 18:34:41 GMT
it's another english-ism, "pants" is one of those swearwords you might use in front of kids like "heck" or "darn". i like it.
|
|